1963 Lancia Appia vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Ka weights approximately 67 kg more than 1963 Lancia Appia.
Because 1963 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Appia | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Appia | Ka |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 40 L |