1963 Lancia Flaminia vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1963 Lancia Flaminia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,775 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 79 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Flaminia | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Lancia | Riley |
| Model | Flaminia | RM A |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2775 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |
