1963 Lancia Flaminia vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,775 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Flaminia (148 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 650 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lancia Flaminia (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Lancia Flaminia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flaminia | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Lancia | Zastava |
Model | Flaminia | 102 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2775 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2160 mm |