1963 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Lancia Flaminia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Flaminia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flaminia | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Flaminia | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |