1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 205 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Flavia | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Flavia | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2350 mm |
