1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 270 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flavia | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Flavia | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |