1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (76 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 734 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (115 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Flavia | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Lancia | Lotus |
| Model | Flavia | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2420 mm |
