1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2000 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2000 Seat Toledo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Toledo (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (76 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Seat Toledo.
Because 1963 Lancia Flavia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Flavia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Toledo (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (115 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flavia | 2000 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Lancia | Seat |
Model | Flavia | Toledo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |