1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flavia | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Flavia | 2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |