1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1963 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (146 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Flavia | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Flavia | 6 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
