1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1963 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flavia | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Flavia | Armada |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 5555 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 106 L |