1963 Lancia Flavia vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (146 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Flavia | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lancia | Holden |
Model | Flavia | Commodore |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |