1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1963 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 weights approximately 204 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Fulvia | 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fulvia | 190 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2410 mm |