1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1962 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1963 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (90 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 310 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (116 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1963 Lancia Fulvia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Fulvia | 1962 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Lancia | Lotus |
| Model | Fulvia | Elite |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1215 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.8 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 66.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 29 L |
