1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1964 Volvo 220 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 220 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. (116 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lancia Fulvia | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Lancia | Volvo |
| Model | Fulvia | 220 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |
