1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 760 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Fulvia | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Fulvia | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3270 mm |