1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Fulvia | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Fulvia | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2490 mm |