1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1480 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Fulvia | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Lancia | Land Rover |
Model | Fulvia | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2890 mm |