1963 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Fulvia | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Fulvia | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2480 mm |