1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 1997 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 1997 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volkswagen W12 (420 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1997 Volkswagen W12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 1997 Volkswagen W12 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Volkswagen |
| Model | Continental | W12 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2550 mm |
