1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Lincoln | Marcos |
| Model | Continental | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 506 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2290 mm |
