1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1400 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Lincoln | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Continental | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2680 mm |