1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S60. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 935 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Continental | S60 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2650 mm |