1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2001 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2001 Mazda B2500 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 660 kg more than 2001 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2001 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2990 mm |
