1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Acura CL. (260 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 820 kg more than 2002 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Lincoln | Acura |
Model | Continental | CL |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2580 mm |