1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2004 Volvo S80
To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S80. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 866 kg more than 2004 Volvo S80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2004 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Continental | S80 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2921 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2650 mm |