1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 212 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
| Model | Continental | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 2188 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2720 mm |
