1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL (383 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 405 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Continental | CL |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 5461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 383 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2960 mm |
