1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Ford Crown Victoria
To start off, 2010 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Ford Crown Victoria. (224 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Crown Victoria. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 456 kg more than 1963 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Ford Crown Victoria | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Crown Victoria |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2920 mm |