1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 631 kg more than 2010 Volvo S60.
Because 2010 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Continental | S60 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1864 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2776 mm |