1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 216 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
| Model | Continental | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2360 mm |
