1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (445 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 670 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Lincoln | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Continental | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 6300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 445 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4707 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2008 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |