1963 Lotus 25 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 644 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus 25 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | 25 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1100 kg |
