1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2000 Vector M12
To start off, 2000 Vector M12 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Vector M12 weights approximately 1174 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2000 Vector M12 | |
Make | Lotus | Vector |
Model | 25 | M12 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 484 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1630 kg |