1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2001 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2001 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Windstar.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2001 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Lotus | Ford |
Model | 25 | Windstar |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |