1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus 25 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | 25 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
