1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2008 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (306 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 656 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2008 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | 25 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1112 kg |