1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2008 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2008 Seat Exeo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2008 Seat Exeo. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2008 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Seat Exeo weights approximately 944 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2008 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | 25 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1400 kg |