1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2008 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2008 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,630 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 919 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Subaru Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Subaru Tribeca has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Subaru Tribeca will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2008 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Lotus | Subaru |
Model | 25 | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3630 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1375 kg |