1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 873 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus 25 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Lotus | Nissan |
| Model | 25 | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1329 kg |
