1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade

To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2051 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: