1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lotus | Citroen |
Model | 25 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |