1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2010 Lexus ES
To start off, 2010 Lexus ES is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus ES (272 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus ES weights approximately 1179 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2010 Lexus ES | |
Make | Lotus | Lexus |
Model | 25 | ES |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1635 kg |