1963 Lotus 25 vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1851 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus 25 | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Lotus | Dodge |
Model | 25 | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 2307 kg |