1963 Lotus Elan vs. 1982 BMW 320
To start off, 1982 BMW 320 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 BMW 320 has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 BMW 320 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elan | 1982 BMW 320 | |
Make | Lotus | BMW |
Model | Elan | 320 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 102 L |