1963 Lotus Elan vs. 1992 Acura Vigor
To start off, 1992 Acura Vigor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Acura Vigor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Acura Vigor (176 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Acura Vigor should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Vigor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elan | 1992 Acura Vigor | |
| Make | Lotus | Acura |
| Model | Elan | Vigor |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
