1963 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Toyota Tacoma
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tacoma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tacoma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Elan | 2004 Toyota Tacoma | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | Tacoma |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 79 L |
