1963 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Volvo S80
To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,916 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S80 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S80 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elan | 2004 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Elan | S80 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2916 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 594 kg | 1657 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |