1963 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elan | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Lotus | Audi |
Model | Elan | A6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2833 mm |