1963 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (68 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 671 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Stilo (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Elan | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Lotus | Fiat |
Model | Elan | Stilo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 594 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |